Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:  
Several manufacturers of RC systems already implemented this protocol to their receivers and MICROBEAST can process the data of these receivers. The advantage is that the data transfer is very fast compared to standard transmission by single wires for each control function. Additionaly you can transfer much more channels at one time and freely distribute the usage of these channels to different control functions. Due to the unique identifier it even is possible to automatically adapt the function allocation specifically to the standard that is used by each radio brand, so that the usage of SRXL is almost "Plug&Play", indepent of the specific type of radio system that is used.
 
Several manufacturers of RC systems already implemented this protocol to their receivers and MICROBEAST can process the data of these receivers. The advantage is that the data transfer is very fast compared to standard transmission by single wires for each control function. Additionaly you can transfer much more channels at one time and freely distribute the usage of these channels to different control functions. Due to the unique identifier it even is possible to automatically adapt the function allocation specifically to the standard that is used by each radio brand, so that the usage of SRXL is almost "Plug&Play", indepent of the specific type of radio system that is used.
   −
Unfortunately some radio systems manufacturers did not fully implement the SRXL standard but only copied the protocol from a different brand of radio systems to be compatible with already exisiting devices. Although this is not a bad idea at all it has the disadvantage that these manufacturers loose the additional features and advantages that come with the unique manufacturer's ID. Additionally when the original manufacturer make changes to his origin protocol in future these systems may work incorrect. So by now it works OK, but we must forcefully point out that this is not the idea behind SRXL!
+
Unfortunately some radio systems manufacturers did not fully implement the SRXL standard but only copied the protocol from a different brand of radio systems to be compatible with already exisiting devices. Although this is not a bad idea at all it has the disadvantage that these manufacturers loose the additional features and advantages that come with the unique manufacturer's ID.
      Line 19: Line 19:       −
The follwing receiver systems are compatible with SRXL as they copied the SRXL protocol as specified by MULTIPLEX. These receivers are often called to be "UDI" compatible which is a designation introduced by a different manufacturer of flybarless systems, but which is nothing different than (MULTIPLEX) SRXL. So these receivers can work with MICROBEAST and MICROBEAST plus without issues, as they will be recognized as MULTIPLEX receiver.
+
The follwing receiver systems are compatible with SRXL as they copied the SRXL protocol as specified for MULTIPLEX. These receivers are often called to be "UDI" compatible which is a designation introduced by a different manufacturer of flybarless systems. So these receivers can work with MICROBEAST and MICROBEAST plus without issues, as they will simply be recognized as MULTIPLEX receiver.
    
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
Bureaucrats, Administrators, translate-proofr
15,511

edits

Navigation menu